The required libraries are sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar codegen-2.2.3.jar ecore-2.2.3.jar ecore-change-2.2.3.jar ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar common-2.2.3.jar xsd-2.2.3.jar stax-api-1.0.1.jar wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar
with backport-util-concurrent being optional if you want threadsafe collections with Java 1.4 IIRC The felix jar inclusions were introduced some time between commit level 600913 and 627754; I'm working on narrowing this down at the moment. Kelvin. 2008/6/2 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is strange. > > Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml changes it so > that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix dependencies > also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that should be > included? > > ...ant > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1 version. > > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven't found > in > > a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have worked is > > the > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly plugin JIRAs, > > but > > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word > dependency. > > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that was to > our > > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other versions > > have > > a bug/bugs. > > > > Kelvin. > > > > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of EMF jars in > the > > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly plugin > version > > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1]. I hope to look > at > > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has any views on > > what > > > version we should be using please pipe up. > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the moment. > > >> > > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and maven > > 2.0.7 > > >> I got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when trying > > to > > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK, > > perhaps > > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in order to avoid IBM JDK > > users > > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9 > > >> > > >> Kelvin. > > >> > > >> > > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> > > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release. > > >>> > > >>> The artifacts including binary and source distributions, staging > maven > > >>> repo > > >>> and release notes are available at > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/> > > >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>. > > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 release is the fix for > > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240. > > >>> > > >>> +1 from me. > > >>> > > >>> ...ant > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
