Thanks Ant, that looks like progress, but the felix framework jar is now
not in the list of distributed jars.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Adding an exclude for felix to the distribution pom can fix that, eg here's
> local changes i have just tried:
>
> Index: src/main/assembly/bin.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- src/main/assembly/bin.xml (revision 662488)
> +++ src/main/assembly/bin.xml (working copy)
> @@ -120,13 +120,13 @@
> <dependencySets>
> <dependencySet>
>
> <outputDirectory>tuscany-sdo-${sdo.version}/lib</outputDirectory>
> - <includes>
> -
> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include>
> + <!-- includes>
> +
> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1</include>
> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-lib</include>
> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-impl</include>
> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:tuscany-sdo-tools</include>
> <include>org.apache.tuscany.sdo:sample-sdo</include>
> - </includes>
> + </includes -->
> <fileMode>0644</fileMode>
> </dependencySet>
>
> Index: pom.xml
> ===================================================================
> --- pom.xml (revision 662488)
> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@
> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId>
> <artifactId>tuscany-sdo-impl</artifactId>
> <version>${pom.version}</version>
> + <exclusions>
> + <exclusion>
> + <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
> + <artifactId>org.apache.felix.main</artifactId>
> + </exclusion>
> + </exclusions>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.tuscany.sdo</groupId>
> @@ -67,6 +73,7 @@
> <artifactId>sample-sdo</artifactId>
> <version>${pom.version}</version>
> </dependency>
> +
> </dependencies>
>
> <build>
>
> Which results in a lib directory containing:
>
> backport-util-concurrent-3.0.jar
> codegen-2.2.3.jar
> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar
> common-2.2.3.jar
> ecore-2.2.3.jar
> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar
> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar
> sample-sdo-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> stax-api-1.0.1.jar
> tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> tuscany-sdo-tools-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar
> xsd-2.2.3.jar
>
> ...ant
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I had an offline chat with Rajini. It seems we need just the framework
> jar
> > of felix in the distro, but if the dependency on felix is declared as
> test
> > scope in the pom, then that jar is not available to main phase of the
> > build. If its not declared as test scope then we get 5 felix jars in the
> > binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she gets some time.
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> >
> > 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> The felix jars were introduced in the fix for "SDO does not work with
> >> OSGi" [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is expected
> >> behaviour, not being an OSGI expert. Comments anyone?
> >>
> >> Kelvin.
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293
> >> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=620763
> >>
> >> 2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> The required libraries are
> >>>
> >>> sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar
> >>> sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar
> >>> tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar
> >>> tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar
> >>> tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar
> >>> codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar
> >>> codegen-2.2.3.jar
> >>> ecore-2.2.3.jar
> >>> ecore-change-2.2.3.jar
> >>> ecore-xmi-2.2.3.jar
> >>> common-2.2.3.jar
> >>> xsd-2.2.3.jar
> >>> stax-api-1.0.1.jar
> >>> wstx-asl-3.2.0.jar
> >>>
> >>> with
> >>> backport-util-concurrent being optional if you want threadsafe
> >>> collections with Java 1.4 IIRC
> >>>
> >>> The felix jar inclusions were introduced some time between commit level
> >>> 600913 and 627754; I'm working on narrowing this down at the moment.
> >>>
> >>> Kelvin.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2008/6/2 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>> It is strange.
> >>>>
> >>>> Removing the <includes> at the bottom of the assembly bin.xml changes
> it
> >>>> so
> >>>> that the dependencies do get included again, but several felix
> >>>> dependencies
> >>>> also get dragged in. What is the complete list of jars that should be
> >>>> included?
> >>>>
> >>>> ...ant
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1
> >>>> version.
> >>>> > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven't
> >>>> found in
> >>>> > a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have
> worked
> >>>> is
> >>>> > the
> >>>> > 2.2-SNAPSHOT version. I have taken a look at the assembly plugin
> >>>> JIRAs,
> >>>> > but
> >>>> > it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word
> >>>> dependency.
> >>>> > It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that was
> to
> >>>> our
> >>>> > advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other
> >>>> versions
> >>>> > have
> >>>> > a bug/bugs.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Kelvin.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2008/6/2 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > I have pinned down the change that caused the absence of EMF jars
> in
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > distribution zip to be the switch from the maven assembly plugin
> >>>> version
> >>>> > > 2.2-SNAPSHOT to the 2.2-beta-2 as altered here [1]. I hope to
> >>>> look at
> >>>> > > this again soon, but have to stop for now. If anyone has any
> views
> >>>> on
> >>>> > what
> >>>> > > version we should be using please pipe up.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Kelvin.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > [1]
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Kelvin.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > 2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the
> >>>> moment.
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and
> >>>> maven
> >>>> > 2.0.7
> >>>> > >> I got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when
> >>>> trying
> >>>> > to
> >>>> > >> build from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK,
> >>>> > perhaps
> >>>> > >> if we need to respin we should raise that in order to avoid IBM
> JDK
> >>>> > users
> >>>> > >> hitting this issue. It's fine with 2.0.9
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> Kelvin.
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> 2008/5/18 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1.1 release.
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> The artifacts including binary and source distributions, staging
> >>>> maven
> >>>> > >>> repo
> >>>> > >>> and release notes are available at
> >>>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> >>>> > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>
> >>>> > >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1.1-RC1/>.
> >>>> > >>> The only difference between this and the 1.1 release is the fix
> >>>> for
> >>>> > >>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2240.
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> +1 from me.
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>> ...ant
> >>>> > >>>
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >>
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
