On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:24 AM, K.M. Richards <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps, since they have been open about what they did and they
>> obviously meant no harm (else they would have attempted something at
>> the time) the committee wants to talk with them to see what needs to
>> be fixed.
>
> What needs to be fixed? Not on guest list = you have to leave. (SNIP)

I saw these guys on the Today Show this morning (I have not really
been following this story too closely). They came across as clueless
but harmless. It seems that they have a history of over-interpreting
casual and ambiguous comments as specific invitations. Apparently
someone in the Defense Department said something - perhaps in an
email, that sounded to them like they would be welcome at the dinner,
and they got it in their head that this was an invitation, even though
that same Defense Department person followed up later with specific
written clairification that they did not have an invitation and were
not cleared to attend the party.

I went to high school with the children of some pretty famous
television and film stars. Not infrequently they or their parents
would say something casually to me and other friends like "you really
should come stay with us at Aspen this holiday". Those of us from more
pedestrian pedigrees would just smile and say "that sounds great" or
(more my speed) "I'd love to but I'm busy". It was pretty well
understood, even by 15 year olds, that if we had taken those comments
as formal invitations and just shown up at their cabin in Aspen
luggage in hand prepared for a week of skiing and hot tubing, we would
have been both embarrassed and disappointed.

It seemed to me that the Salahi's are a couple that take everyone of
those casual, polite, ambiguous and insincere allusions to sharing
time as an official invitation engraved in marble, and act
accordingly. The interview was short and fairly non-specific (they
promised to come back later after they have permission to talk more
freely) - I leave the door open on the possibility that they are some
variant of stalkers, erotomaniacs or other kind of delusional
disorder.

-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en

Reply via email to