On Dec 1, 10:37 am, "Kevin M." <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:24 AM, K.M. Richards <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps, since they have been open about what they did and they > > obviously meant no harm (else they would have attempted something at > > the time) the committee wants to talk with them to see what needs to > > be fixed. > > What needs to be fixed? Not on guest list = you have to leave. Or, to > quote Indiana Jones after he threw a Nazi soldier out of the window of > a zeppelin, "No ticket!" > > Simple.
Kevin, neither you nor I were at the White House that evening, so we have no direct knowledge of exactly what happened. And some of what has been reported conflicts with other reports, so it is difficult to get a clear picture. (Indeed, there has been confusion as to whether or not they were on the guest list, and if so, on which list.) I would therefore suggest that the committee is trying to get a clear picture itself, and therefore inviting them to talk about what happened from their perspective so that whatever did happen won't happen again. Call it "closing a loophole" if you want, but your reply does not change my opinion. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
