On Dec 2, 9:23 pm, "Kevin M." <[email protected]> wrote: > Two more articles, both at least conceding that until the interview > has been made public, it is difficult to fully judge the decision to > offer refunds or an apology for it. > > http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2010/12/02/131750301/steve-martin-... > > http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/12/02/steve_martin_92y_fiasco >
This NY Times blog item is quite interesting: http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/readers-weigh-in-on-ys-decision-to-give-refunds-for-steve-martin-interview/ Be sure to read the comments below the main blog post, some of which were submitted by people who actually saw the interview. Many of them lay the blame on the interviewer. See especially #8 (Doris), #20 (Anne), #22 (Chuck M.), #26 (Art Lover). Art Lover also links to a blow-by-blow description of the interview, which is quite shocking: http://emdashes.com/2010/12/more-on-martin-and-solomon-and.php -Tim -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
