On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Seriously? I'd rank Stewart second, behind Letterman, and on a par with > Craig Ferguson (in the sense that Ferguson's interviews are usually > entertaining, if they're not necessarily all that serious)...at least among > those hosts whose shows are primarily entertainment-centric. > > I'm also going to be interested in what CBS tries to do. The pickin'sfor a > replacement seem awfully slim to me. I can't imagine them completely > abandoning late night, with the investment they made in the franchise over > the last 20 years, but the wrong choice for a replacement host (or a > replacement show, for that matter) could have disastrous results. >
Seriously. Stewart is great with authors, journalists and politicians, but really sucks with celebrities (and probably even worse when it is someone he knows well). Plus there is really nothing in it for him - I doubt he would make more money, and he would not be able to do the kind of show he is doing now. I guess the main draw for him would be that a network show would have to be a hell of a lot less work than what he is doing now. -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
