I guarantee you that there is at least one psychology professor at every college and university in the college doing exactly what I am doing today, which is grabbing video and images and text about this event to integrate into my lectures on the fallibility and social construction of human memory. This is essentially the same thing that happened to Hillary in 2008, and her mis-remembering of dodging bullets on the tarmac. It is also the same thing that every single one of us does at least once a week, telling a story after dinner, or over drinks to buddies, elaborating and distorting events to make them more interesting, more flattering, shorter, longer, easier to remember or more consistent with the current context. Yes, some of this is intentional and conscious exaggeration, bordering on lying, but most of it happens at a non-conscious level.
That is not to excuse Williams. A journalist more than most should be wary of the limits of human memory, and the importance of accuracy, and double check facts before reporting on air important events. And, to Joe's point, we would like to see credible journalists (that is, journalists interested in retaining their credibility) being more reluctant to report stories in which they themselves at the subject - and when they do, they must be doubly concerned with accuracy, and with checking the all too human tendency to inflate their own role in any story. I don't think that firing is a proportional response; I guess if NBC News wanted to suspend him for a week that would signify that they were taking it seriously. The problem is that the penalty for this kind of think should be that the population of news consumers downgrades Williams as a source of accurate and credible news; but in the last decade or two credibility has ceased to be a defining characteristic of any news source. Even with this flaw, Williams and NBC are a more credible source of news that anything available on cable. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Joe Hass <[email protected]> wrote: > Two paths seems to be emerging. > > 1. Some great mocking at Williams: > http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/02/04/brian-williams-faces-fierce-mockery-after-recanting-iraq-war-story/ > and > http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-brian-williams-social-media-20150204-htmlstory.html > > 2. A sense that Williams should be disciplined, if not outright fired, for > this (primarily from the journalism watchers): > http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/rieder/2015/02/05/brian-williams-unmitigated-disaster/22915325/ > and > http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/02/04/brian-williams-taints-his-brand.html > > I know I raised in this forum a question about Williams and how he > sometimes seems to skate the line between a member of a news organization > and an entertainer, only to be convinced by the panel I was being > oversensitive about it. Fundamentally, this isn't a huge deal. But that > voice that was silenced way back when is kinda screaming back at me that > this is the kind of crap it was talking about. > > On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 9:00:18 AM Bob Jersey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> He apologized Wednesday (4) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33RSg9CBtUY> >> ('toob) for having said on NBC's telecast of an NHL game as part of a >> ceremony honouring a servicemember* -* and in 2013 to Dave - that a >> chopper he was in while covering Iraq fighting in 2003 got hit by enemy >> fire... the US military-newser Stars and Stripes busted him >> <http://www.stripes.com/news/us/nbc-s-brian-williams-recants-iraq-story-after-soldiers-protest-1.327792> >> (link) after gripes from three actual occupants of the attacked craft that >> he was in a different chopper... >> >> B >> >> -- >> -- >> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "TV or Not TV" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TVorNotTV" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > -- > TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "TV or Not TV" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TVorNotTV" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
