With all due respect to your opinion, which I have no doubt is more informed 
and worthy than mine, it seems to me that there’s a difference between a 
mundane story that’s been retold and enhanced over the years into an 
unrecognizable fiction, and claiming to be a passenger on a helicopter that 
takes a hit from a rocket-propelled grenade and is essentially forced to crash 
land in B.F.Iraq.  I can excuse the mis-remembering of an event that has 
nothing all that memorable about it in the first place; a potentially 
life-threatening situation would be a different animal entirely.  Those who 
were actually there are unlikely to ever forget it, and those who weren’t 
shouldn’t be able to innocently create that memory out of whole cloth.

 

We disagree about whether firing would be an appropriate response (and I happen 
to be a big BriWi fan!).  But we do agree that “Williams and NBC  are a more 
credible source of news than anything available on cable.”  But while you 
appear to be using that to enhance the defense of Williams, I just find it 
incredibly sad.

 

Doug Fields

Tampa, FL

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of PGage
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] BriWi retracts an old tale of war helicopter

 

I guarantee you that there is at least one psychology professor at every 
college and university in the college doing exactly what I am doing today, 
which is grabbing video and images and text about this event to integrate into 
my lectures on the fallibility and social construction of human memory. This is 
essentially the same thing that happened to Hillary in 2008, and her 
mis-remembering of dodging bullets on the tarmac. It is also the same thing 
that every single one of us does at least once a week, telling a story after 
dinner, or over drinks to buddies, elaborating and distorting events to make 
them more interesting, more flattering, shorter, longer, easier to remember or 
more consistent with the current context. Yes, some of this is intentional and 
conscious exaggeration, bordering on lying, but most of it happens at a 
non-conscious level.

 

That is not to excuse Williams. A journalist more than most should be wary of 
the limits of human memory, and the importance of accuracy, and double check 
facts before reporting on air important events. And, to Joe's point, we would 
like to see credible journalists (that is, journalists interested in retaining 
their credibility) being more reluctant to report stories in which they 
themselves at the subject - and when they do, they must be doubly concerned 
with accuracy, and with checking the all too human tendency to inflate their 
own role in any story.

 

I don't think that firing is a proportional response; I guess if NBC News 
wanted to suspend him for a week that would signify that they were taking it 
seriously. The problem is that the penalty for this kind of think should be 
that the population of news consumers downgrades Williams as a source of 
accurate and credible news; but in the last decade or two credibility has 
ceased to be a defining characteristic of any news source. Even with this flaw, 
Williams and NBC are a more credible source of news that anything available on 
cable.

 

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Joe Hass <[email protected]> wrote:

Two paths seems to be emerging.

1. Some great mocking at Williams: 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/02/04/brian-williams-faces-fierce-mockery-after-recanting-iraq-war-story/
 and 
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-brian-williams-social-media-20150204-htmlstory.html

2. A sense that Williams should be disciplined, if not outright fired, for this 
(primarily from the journalism watchers): 
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/rieder/2015/02/05/brian-williams-unmitigated-disaster/22915325/
 and 
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/02/04/brian-williams-taints-his-brand.html

 

I know I raised in this forum a question about Williams and how he sometimes 
seems to skate the line between a member of a news organization and an 
entertainer, only to be convinced by the panel I was being oversensitive about 
it. Fundamentally, this isn't a huge deal. But that voice that was silenced way 
back when is kinda screaming back at me that this is the kind of crap it was 
talking about.

 

On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 9:00:18 AM Bob Jersey <[email protected]> wrote:


He apologized Wednesday (4) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33RSg9CBtUY>  
('toob) for having said on NBC's telecast of an NHL game as part of a ceremony 
honouring a servicemember - and in 2013 to Dave - that a chopper he was in 
while covering Iraq fighting in 2003 got hit by enemy fire... the US 
military-newser Stars and Stripes busted him 
<http://www.stripes.com/news/us/nbc-s-brian-williams-recants-iraq-story-after-soldiers-protest-1.327792>
  (link) after gripes from three actual occupants of the attacked craft that he 
was in a different chopper...

B

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4281/9061 - Release Date: 02/05/15

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4273/9047 - Release Date: 02/02/15

-- 
-- 
TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TV or Not TV" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to