You're correct. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/abc-news-staff-in-direct-contact-with-chris-christie-to-self-isolate?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=THR%20Breaking%20News&utm_term=hollywoodreporter_breakingnews
On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 1:07 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Christie tested positive. He had done debate prep with Trump, then > moved over to ABC News to do commentary after the debate. Does anybody know > if he was seated with the news team? I thought he was; if so, he’s probably > infected the whole news team, who has infected their families. > > At this point, I’d like a class action lawsuit against Trump; his > recklessness put people’s lives in danger, including his own, which > personally doesn’t matter, but a president out of action is a matter of > national security, so the case can be made his actions led to a national > crisis. > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:46 PM Kevin M. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Specifically related to the debate, Wallace confirmed that Trump and his >> entourage arrived too late to be Covid-19 tested prior to the debate, and >> were “on the honor system” that they were not infected. >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 9:36 AM 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Trump, as you might have seen elsewhere, and Melania have tested >>> positive. VP and Mrs Pence were negative. Wallace told F&F: >>> >>> >>> >>> "I'm gonna have to get a test..." >>> >>> >>> https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/moderator-chris-wallace-details-debate-safety-procedures-after-trump-tests-positive-for-covid-19 >>> (link) >>> >>> Tom Wolper, to PGage, Oct 1st: >>> >>>> The Commission needs to inform both candidates that the moderators of >>>>> remaining “events” will have the power to enforce the rules both campaigns >>>>> agreed to, including turning off microphones when the other side has the >>>>> floor, when time has expired, or when candidates ignore the direction of >>>>> the moderator. If they don’t want to accept that they should not show up. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It is a given that no matter what rules are set Trump is going to break >>>> them if it is to his perceived advantage. So the debate organizers can >>>> change the rules, get both campaigns to agree to the new rules, and at the >>>> debate Trump will still break them without a second thought. If the >>>> organizers push to make a structure where Trump can't storm and bully, his >>>> campaign will not agree to them. >>>> >>>> There has been a great expansion of the executive branch and its powers >>>> since FDR first took office. There was always an assumption that there >>>> would be some institutional check on that power if needed and maintaining >>>> the integrity of the democracy would be more in the interest of both major >>>> parties than short term partisan advantage. Trump, along with his cronies, >>>> lawyers, and Attorney General, have challenged any attempt to hold him >>>> accountable for anything including following the law. Trump has now >>>> internalized that he can simply act with impunity and he will not be held >>>> to account. But the political institutions and political media are in >>>> denial about this and they would rather watch government operations and the >>>> rituals around the election turn into a farce than try to design the >>>> processes to account for Trump not following rules or laws. >>>> >>> >>> >>> B >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CA%2B_fQPwubUkc3GY0BfboaxiqtW57n6EfFngP%2BQ50b9RkaWab3Q%40mail.gmail.com.
