"It will instead continue offering the latter as a stand-alone product as 
it moves forward with the springtime launch of a comprehensive service 
featuring programming from HBO Max and Discovery+."

Read: It's still going to bring Discovery+ programming over to (HBO)Max, 
but Disco+ will remain as a cheaper stand-alone option for people who want 
90 Day Fiancé and House Hunters but don't want John Oliver & Game of 
Thrones.
On Wednesday, February 8, 2023 at 10:25:02 AM UTC-5 Kevin M. (RPCV) wrote:

> Our house probably watches Discovery more than HBO. My wife likes anything 
> “true crime” no matter how poorly produced (and most are poorly produced), 
> and we both like animal focused documentaries. This week we’ve been 
> watching “The Zoo” about the behind the scenes world of the San Diego Zoo 
> and Safari Park. 
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 7:18 AM Adam Bowie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Reports now suggest that Warner Bros. Discovery is going to keep what is 
>> now called HBO Max and Discovery+ separate. 
>>
>>
>> https://deadline.com/2023/02/warner-bros-discovery-abandons-plan-to-merge-hbo-max-discovery-plus-streaming-1235253134/
>>
>> Basically it seems that current Discovery+ subscribers are unlikely to 
>> pay the much higher prices that the combined app might charge. Considering 
>> that's now $16, that's quite a jump from $7 for the current ad-free version 
>> of Discovery+.
>>
>> That doesn't seem to have changed plans to rebrand the service to 
>> something like "Max" (branding experts really are good aren't they? Case in 
>> point "Paramount+ with Showtime"), but I guess the higher priced tier could 
>> still include Discovery+ programming in it as well.
>>
>> Over here in the UK, Discovery+ has been going around doing deals to 
>> bundle themselves with other platforms. In the last few weeks I've gained 
>> two different ways to get the app free. My TV comes via a Sky dish (these 
>> days owned by Comcast), and because I get the Entertainment package it's 
>> included there. I also subscribe to BT Sport and they recently got into bed 
>> with Discovery, so they too have offered it to me free. I duly created an 
>> account and aside from cycling, which I already had access to two other 
>> subscriptions, there really is nothing of interest on the platform. 
>>
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 5:21 AM Stan S <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, HBO still has Cinemax. It confused me that HBO Max didn’t 
>>> really roll in the Cinemax brand. After all, their streaming used to be 
>>> called “Max Go”. Besides the valuable channel space I wonder why the linear 
>>> Cinemax channels still exist. 
>>>
>>> So after all that money that they spend, WBD will release a “Max” app 
>>> and people will wonder why they suddenly need Cinemax. 
>>>
>>> -Stan
>>> On Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 12:58:35 PM UTC-5 [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I never understood why the WB leaned on Michigan J. Frog and not, say, 
>>>> Bugs or Daffy.  Unless the studio told them certain characters were 
>>>> off-limits...
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 1:04:10 PM UTC-5 Kevin M. (RPCV) 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frogsploitation. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:10 AM M-D November <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it's time to bring Michigan J. Frog out of retirement and use 
>>>>>> him as a brand ambassador?  (Although maybe make him a little less of a 
>>>>>> stereotype than the WB did back in the day...)
>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 12:00:29 PM UTC-5 Adam Bowie wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was convinced they'd just go with "HBO Discovery" or "Discovery 
>>>>>>> HBO" - simply on the basis of brand recognition alone. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I'm sure someone somewhere has done some research that says 
>>>>>>> that HBO is considered too premium/male/old-skewing for some consumers, 
>>>>>>> I'm 
>>>>>>> not sure I'd buy that. It just takes one hit show to wipe away those 
>>>>>>> perceptions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Surely you just go with the brand that has the biggest impact. "HBO" 
>>>>>>> means good TV. "Discovery" means... well we sort of understand what it 
>>>>>>> means. "Max" means nothing to anyone. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Every other streaming brand has taken its strongest individual brand 
>>>>>>> and built off that. CBS All Access becomes Paramount+ because more 
>>>>>>> people 
>>>>>>> know Paramount than CBS - particularly if you have global aspirations 
>>>>>>> (there not being a bunch of CBS channels out there in the wild). 
>>>>>>> Disney+ 
>>>>>>> wisely trades on their most valuable asset - their near century-old 
>>>>>>> brand 
>>>>>>> (I'm also firmly of the belief that ABC, FX and Hulu shows can all be 
>>>>>>> wrapped into a single app, just becoming tiled sub-brands within it, 
>>>>>>> exactly as they're doing in the ROW). Peacock is a meaningless brand 
>>>>>>> outside the US. Nobody has a clue who they are, or why it's named after 
>>>>>>> a 
>>>>>>> bird that was kept by wealthy aristocrats. But then NBC's global 
>>>>>>> presence 
>>>>>>> is largely limited to a financial business channel, because even though 
>>>>>>> viewers throughout the world know NBC shows, they're not branded as 
>>>>>>> such 
>>>>>>> (Friends is Warners etc). 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WBD is going to have to spend sooooo much money explaining who they 
>>>>>>> are to consumers when they already had two perfectly good brands that 
>>>>>>> already explained that. Their rivals will be scratching their heads 
>>>>>>> wondering at the madness of it all. "HBO" already has lots of value 
>>>>>>> globally. Game of Thrones on its own is enough to say "We make TV you 
>>>>>>> want 
>>>>>>> to watch" globally - no more, no less. Throw in something like 
>>>>>>> "Euphoria" 
>>>>>>> and I think you're done. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Similarly, "Discovery" is another decades old brand which instantly 
>>>>>>> tells you what you need to know about its programming. Why any 
>>>>>>> marketing 
>>>>>>> person would want to ditch those powerful brands is beyond me. All 
>>>>>>> their 
>>>>>>> marketing is going to have to have to explain it all over again to 
>>>>>>> consumers. I mean unless they're going to pivot entirely on what they 
>>>>>>> make, 
>>>>>>> and for all the cuts that WBD is making, I don't think Zaslov actually 
>>>>>>> wants to do that. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, I'd be amazed if they don't run into IP issues with the name 
>>>>>>> "Max" all over the world because it's such a simple name, and there 
>>>>>>> will be 
>>>>>>> dozens of businesses in overlapping areas. There definitely *will* be 
>>>>>>> territories where they simply can't use it - at least unless they start 
>>>>>>> writing massive cheques. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Adam
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 3:17 PM PGage <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I have heard different takes on this; those who are saying Zas 
>>>>>>>> is getting rid of HBO are, I think, clearly wrong. HBO will still 
>>>>>>>> exist as 
>>>>>>>> a premium cable channel that can also be streamed, but the name HBO 
>>>>>>>> will no 
>>>>>>>> longer be included in Warner Brothers Discovery Streaming Hub site, 
>>>>>>>> which 
>>>>>>>> is on track to being called simply “Max.” That is the sacrifice of 
>>>>>>>> significant brand awareness.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The fact that Discovery doesn’t want the HBO brand on its signature 
>>>>>>>> mothership tells us everything we need to know about WBD. Whether 
>>>>>>>> still 
>>>>>>>> deserved or not the HBO brand signifies quality programming; but WBD’s 
>>>>>>>> brand is cheap, mass appeal, not elite quality. They are McDonald’s, 
>>>>>>>> not 
>>>>>>>> French Laundry. And, of course, as much money as Thomas Keller makes, 
>>>>>>>> I’m 
>>>>>>>> sure it’s not a major fraction of what McDonald’s clears every year.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still, if the French Laundry was purchased by Macdonald’s, and they 
>>>>>>>> forced customers to walk into a local McDonald’s to make reservations 
>>>>>>>> at 
>>>>>>>> the French Laundry, a lot of folks would be irritated.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> =======
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> “The merged platform’s expected name, “Max,” is being vetted by the 
>>>>>>>> company’s lawyers, according to people familiar with the matter…
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The app itself will share similarities with Disney+’s platform, 
>>>>>>>> with Warner Bros. Discovery’s brands as individual tiles, the people 
>>>>>>>> said. 
>>>>>>>> HBO, Discovery, DC Comics and Warner Bros. will be among the landing 
>>>>>>>> hubs 
>>>>>>>> on the platform, the people added.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/05/warner-bros-discovery-max-streaming-service-name.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYL98tsT_-tPi%3Du%3DkTS_WPWw-gDWPdm8nHQ%3Db3kCnojkyg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAKGtkYL98tsT_-tPi%3Du%3DkTS_WPWw-gDWPdm8nHQ%3Db3kCnojkyg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/7da27144-92b9-471e-a6ac-19296acf7e6an%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/7da27144-92b9-471e-a6ac-19296acf7e6an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/006449cd-0e38-43d6-8bf0-7821e850ccben%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/006449cd-0e38-43d6-8bf0-7821e850ccben%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TVorNotTV" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAD_sJGCt23LAAf-_PSw7AZxZkCyWc1YRwE%2Bjb7%2B3G%3DtnNnxv%3DA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/CAD_sJGCt23LAAf-_PSw7AZxZkCyWc1YRwE%2Bjb7%2B3G%3DtnNnxv%3DA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> -- 
> Kevin M. (RPCV)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TVorNotTV" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvornottv/66ffb8a6-0a17-49a6-ae79-3e8f33b26548n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to