On Saturday, September 12, 2015 at 2:41:01 PM UTC+3, Cathal (Phone) wrote: > > You're swapping context. > Nope. The context was [and remains] censorship.
Because Tor *cannot* filter content > And that's a *good* thing. Right? It's not "poor litle tor, too bad it can't censor", it's a feature. Unlike tor, for twister, censorship-resillience is *the* feature. Now *you* stop switching context [to tor] :p > , Jacob, and I, agree that investigating CP sites needs to be a forensic > task. > > Maybe, but what you don't seem to agree with Jacob is that if there *is* a way to block information, it *will* be used by *hostile* poeple against benign *victims*. > Twister may have similar goals but is architecturally entirely unlike Tor. > Right. > It's more like Freenet without baked-in traffic mixing. > I wasn't the one who talked against switching context, but please, stick to the point. Twister, censorship, paedo, forensics, apelbaum. > Pedo material is shared in cleartext, replicated, and stored by all users > adjacent to it. > So now you're a paedo expert? [citation needed] > It can and should be filtered by them, ' > > and if they feel like helping investigators they should record where they > got it so the source can be located. > > Investigations are not something you should "feel happy" to cooperate with. Formal investigations are 99% coverups by the paedos themselves [UK prime fokking minister Heath used to *be* one FFS. Would you be "happy" to help an investigation by his lackeys?] Heck. To *really* investigate in such an environment you need bigger balls than Annie Machon ;) Even so, intermediaries shouldn't be liable if they unknowingly relayed CP. > Wrong: by giving people the "right" to censor [because paedo is bad and nevermind forensic I got a smart answer here etc.] you turn them into hostages [say, of a paedo judge]. Today I can't stop relaying shit even if I wanted. This is something I can tell a judge. Don't *rob me* of this important *right* by saying you're giving me the right of choice. I'm no choire boy. I'll bite your dick off if you get cheeky. > But that's a legal issue, > Legal issues are for the poor. The rich get bailouts, not justice > code can't help with that. > google up "code is law lessig" > People think if Twister is deliberately designed not to let me filter > content that I can claim helplessness before a judge? > Yes > Don't make me laugh. A judge would throw that out instantly. > And do what? impelement that feature? He can't do it unless you [his minion] helps > Twister is not Tor. Parallels between the two aare technically and legally > worthless. > > > You want me to knowingly store and forward child porn and think my failure > to is "cebsorship" or "obstructing justice"? > Yes!!!!!!1 > You understand neither word. > > Enlighten me -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "twister-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
