True. But I'm pretty sure that there are more active grandfathered
sources then OAuth sources. And it takes nothing to create a new OAuth
application that has the same source as an existing OAuth application
but with only a slightly different name.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 08:39, DWRoelands<duane.roela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's not correct. Updates posted to Twitter via Basic Auth always
> appear with a source of "From Web" (unless the application in question
> was "grandfathered in"). Otherwise, it's not possible to impersonate
> another application via Basic Auth.
> On Jul 1, 9:34 am, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Using basic auth it is already possible to use any
>> source and "impersonate" another application so not much is changing
>> here except better security for web applications.
Abraham Williams | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
Project | http://fireeagle.labs.poseurtech.com
This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private.