Dewald, I'm not heading anywhere with it. I just want Twitter to clarify the terms, that's all. Feel free to leave your input if you have an opinion on what those details should be.
Jesse On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jesse, > > I know where you are heading with this. ;-) > > If a user explicitly activates a feature in an app that sends DMs on > their behalf, they at that point explicitly grants the app permission > to do so. > > Dewald > > On Sep 10, 10:10 pm, Jesse Stay <jesses...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This is great news! Regarding "sending Tweets on a user's behalf", does > > that refer to DMs as well, and when seeking permission, must it be on a > > "tweet-by-tweet" basis, or can a user give you permission beforehand to > have > > complete control over Tweeting on their behalf? I'd like to see that > part > > clarified more. > > Thanks, > > > > Jesse > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Marcel Molina <mar...@twitter.com> > wrote: > > > > > To accompany our updated Terms of Service (http://bit.ly/2ZXsyW) we've > > > posted a draft of the Twitter API rules at > > >http://twitter.com/apirules. As the subject states, these rules are a > > > work in progress and feedback is welcome. Please read the TOS > > > announcement athttp://bit.ly/2ZXsyWfor some background. We encourage > > > you to use the "contact us" link athttp://twitter.com/apiruleswith > > > any feedback you may have. > > > > > -- > > > Marcel Molina > > > Twitter Platform Team > > >http://twitter.com/noradio >
