I assume you're caching the tweets in a local DB or something in order to
provide histories of > 3200 tweets. For now, can't you also just cache the
geocode info?

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:11, jim.renkel <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> As an alternative to a hard coded 7 days for the interval to the
> removal of geocoding information from a tweet, I suggest that an
> optional "expires" parameter be added to the statuses/update method.
> The value of this parameter would give the number of days between the
> tweet creation and when the geocoding would be removed from the tweet.
>
> The default value of the parameter, i.e., the value used if the
> parameter is not present in a statuses/update request, would be 7, in
> conformance with current policy.
>
> An explicit value of 0 would indicate that the geocoding information
> is never to be removed (But see below.).
>
> You may also want to consider a new method that removes the geocoding
> information from an existing tweet, even if the interval was specified
> as 0. Obviously, irreversible, like deleting a tweet, and could only
> be done by the creator of the tweet, like the statuses/destroy method.
>
> Comments expected and welcome.
>
> Jim Renkel
>
> On Sep 29, 12:42 pm, Raffi Krikorian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I just noticed this in the API wiki, under the statuses/update method:
> >
> > >    "Currently, all geolocated information will be removed after seven
> > > days."
> >
> > > Two questions:
> >
> > > 1. What exactly will be removed: the geocoding attached to the tweet?
> > > Or the whole tweet?
> >
> > the geocoding attached to the tweet.
> >
> > > 2. Why? I.e., why remove the geocoding or the whole tweet? I can think
> > > of many use cases where it is important for the geocoding to remain as
> > > long as the tweet remains. For example, I take a great vacation
> > > picture, upload it to Twitpic, then tweet about it, including where I
> > > took it. The location where I took the picture remains the same
> > > forever. Why delete the geocoding information from the tweet, or the
> > > whole tweet. This will just cause folk to put the geocoding
> > > information in the text of the tweet, taking up valuable space and
> > > reducing the value of geocoding tweets, and cause developers (Like me,
> > > admittedly) to develop applications that put the geocoding in the text
> > > of the tweet. With applications like that available, twitter users are
> > > less likely to go to the botther of opting-in to twitter geocoding of
> > > their tweets.
> >
> > this is being done for privacy issues, and in the future data will be
> > kept for longer once more sophisticated privacy controls are put into
> > place.
> >
> > --
> > Raffi Krikorian
> > Twitter Platform Team
> > [email protected] | @raffi




-- 
Internets. Serious business.

Reply via email to