This reminds me. Not so long ago, also over a form response, I hurled
my toys out of the cot so violently that I'm still searching for my
favorite rubber duck.

There should be a lesson in here somewhere.

And the lesson is: Form responses are good __only__ for the
shareholders.

On Feb 11, 5:38 pm, Aral Balkan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> My greatest issue with all this is that you appear to have a form response.
> Currently, you're just not handling account transfers at all. And that's the
> same policy for general users (of which you have gazillions) and developers
> (of which you have an order of magnitude or two less).
>
> The account I am asking about has not tweeted since 2007.
>
> It is not a request asking you to favor one person over another. It is a
> request to favor a new Twitter application over an account that hasn't been
> used in three years.
>
> If a human being looked at it, the decision would be clear and would
> probably take 1/10th the time to execute than all these emails have taken.
>
> My suggestion: expire accounts that haven't been used in over 12 months and
> don't have to deal with it.
>
> If that's too harsh, at least handle *trademark* requests. My app's name
> _is_ a trademark even if it isn't a _registered_ trademark. Forcing me to
> register my trademark (can I register it in the UK, where I live, or do I
> have to get a US registered trademark?) just adds more financial
> responsibility on my shoulders.
>
> I put in a trademark request as per the link Raffi gave but I haven't heard
> anything back – not even an automated response saying you guys received the
> email.
>
> On the whole, I just feel unloved because I've put a lot of time and effort
> into an app that I feel will make Twitter a bit more fun and I don't feel
> that the request to have the Twitter account with my app's name – one that
> hasn't been used in three years – is an unrealistic request to make.
>
> Let's say my app is called Dodo. I'm just sad that I am going to launch with
> the Twitter account @dodo or even @dodoapp – because both are taken and
> unused - but that I'm going to launch with @dodo_app.
>
> That you guys don't see this is a problem makes me think that you don't
> care.
>
> All the best,
> Aral
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Ryan Sarver <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Aral,
>
> > I'm not sure where you get the idea that we don't care about developers and
> > that humans aren't involved in the process. Raffi and the rest of the
> > platform team actively respond to emails from developers at all hours of the
> > day on both weekdays and weekends.
>
> > As for the issue of handing over @usernames we need to have a rational and
> > scalable approach to doing so. We can't just hand it out to one person
> > because we like them more than another user. So if there is a dispute over a
> > username we need to follow a standard procedure. We obviously love our
> > developers and work really hard to support them in all the ways that we can,
> > but there needs to be some process that works across the board. If you have
> > a constructive suggestion on how that can be done other than just badgering
> > the people trying to help you, then by all means work with us on it and we
> > are totally open to coming up with a better solution. But to date, this is
> > the best solution we have that scales to the number and complexity of the
> > requests that we receive.
>
> > I've always stated that we are open to criticism and feedback on how we can
> > improve, but we ask that it be done constructively.
>
> > Ryan
>
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Aral Balkan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Ah, so Twitter wants to see a *registered* trademark number?
>
> >> (As an aside: why do you hate your developers, Twitter?) :)
>
> >> The thing is, a trademark does not _have to be_ registered to be a
> >> trademark. Products get trademark protection automatically.
>
> >> I guess if I don't hear back, I'll have the IP law firm I use to write a
> >> letter first. Cheaper than getting a registered trademark.
>
> >> Of course, the best thing would be for a _human being_ at Twitter to say:
> >> hey developer dude, we love you, sure we can do that... don't mention it!
> >> :)
>
> >> (I just don't get this impersonal "computer says NO" attitude towards
> >> developers. Is this just the corporate culture at Twitter or are you guys
> >> severely short-staffed? Thinking Twitter really needs to invest in 
> >> developer
> >> relations. Maybe get someone whose job it is to handle developer relations
> >> and champion the needs of developers within Twitter?)
>
> >> Aral
>
> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, anilchawla <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> Raffi, thank you for the response, but it is disappointing. I have to
> >>> agree completely with Aral that these requests are not for "personal
> >>> use". Some of us have hundreds/thousands of users around the world who
> >>> use our apps as a means to participate on Twitter, and it is
> >>> ultimately those users who are affected. In my my case, I have had
> >>> several users mistakingly mention or try to follow this inactive spam
> >>> account (http://twitter.com/tweetymail) thinking that it was
> >>> associated with my service. In the meantime, I am doing the best I can
> >>> to communicate with these users using another account.
>
> >>> FYI, I did not have any success opening support tickets for
> >>> brandsquatting/impersonation. Originally, I was told to wait until
> >>> 1/31/10 for the username to remain inactive. When I complied and
> >>> opened a new request on 2/1, I was immediately denied. It seems that
> >>> brand-squatting/impersonation/brand-confusion are all irrelevant...
> >>> Twitter wants to see a trademark number. I am a hobby developer who
> >>> provides a free service completely out-of-pocket, and now I need to
> >>> spend hundreds of dollars to register a trademark just to get access
> >>> to a username that nobody ever used?
>
> >>> I see that you have also replaced the text of the FAQ entry with the
> >>> more generic policy regarding trademark infringement. This is too bad,
> >>> but I guess it answers my original question -- the existing entry was
> >>> no longer valid. I certainly understand that Twitter can't always
> >>> transfer usernames to app developers who want them, but there are
> >>> certainly cases in which a username (inactive/never tweeted/created
> >>> for spam) could be put to better use. A blanket policy on trademark
> >>> infringement may make sense for companies and large brands, but it
> >>> does nothing at all to help the small-time hobby developers who
> >>> contribute so much to the Twitter ecosystem.
>
> >>> On Feb 10, 7:34 pm, Raffi Krikorian <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > hi all, please refer to
>
> >>> >http://apiwiki.twitter.com/FAQ#HowcanIreclaimaninactiveTwitteraccount.
> >>> ..
>
> >>> > We are unable to transfer usernames for personal use at this time. If
> >>> you
> >>> > believe a Twitter account may be squatting on your trademark and
> >>> violating
> >>> > Twitter's Terms of Service, please file a ticket athttp://
> >>> help.twitter.com/requests/newregarding 'Trademark/Brand squatting'.
>
> >>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Kyle Mulka <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > I also have this problem and have gotten no response whatsoever from
> >>> > > Twitter.
>
> >>> > > Here's the inactive account that I'd like to have:
> >>> > >http://twitter.com/twilk
>
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Kyle Mulka
> >>> > > Founder, Congo Labs
> >>> > >http://twilk.com
>
> >>> > > On Feb 10, 6:41 pm, Anil Chawla <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > > > Thanks, glad to know I'm not alone on this. I've looked at filing a
> >>> > > > trademark but it is still frustrating to proceed through
> >>> > > > lengthy/costly legal process in order to reclaim an inactive/spam
> >>> > > > username -- especially for a completely free service. This entry in
> >>> > > > the Twitter API FAQ is a glimmer of hope for app developers. I hope
> >>> > > > someone at Twitter can help app developers get their specific
> >>> > > > situation reviewed. In some cases, such as mine, it is an
> >>> > > > all-around-win for the Twitter ecosystem to release these inactive
> >>> > > > usernames.
>
> >>> > > > -Anil
>
> >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Aral Balkan <[email protected]
>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > I had the same response :(
> >>> > > > > Someone told me that the way to approach it may be to file a
> >>> trademark
> >>> > > > > dispute. This is what I'm going to be forced to do since it
> >>> doesn't
> >>> > > appear
> >>> > > > > possible to talk to a human being at Twitter about this issue.
> >>> > > > > All the best,
> >>> > > > > Aral
> >>> > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, anilchawla <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>> > > > >> I develop and maintain a free Twitter application (http://
> >>> > > > >> tweetymail.com) and I am desperately trying to reclaim the
> >>> inactive
> >>> > > > >> 'tweetymail' username because it is causing confusion among my
> >>> users.
> >>> > > > >> I was not able to get anywhere with Twitter support, but I came
> >>> across
> >>> > > > >> this entry in the API FAQ:
>
> >>>http://apiwiki.twitter.com/FAQ#HowcanIreclaimaninactiveTwitteraccount.
> >>> > > ..
>
> >>> > > > >> I followed the instructions and emailed [email protected].
> >>> Five
> >>> > > > >> minutes later, I received two simultaneous emails: 1) An
> >>> automatic
> >>> > > > >> notice indicating that support received my request, 2) An
> >>> automatic
> >>> > > > >> rejection indicating that Twitter is not releasing inactive
> >>> usernames
> >>> > > > >> at this time.
>
> >>> > > > >> Have any other app developers had success with this process? Is
> >>> the
> >>> > > > >> information on the FAQ still valid? Can someone from Twitter
> >>> provide
> >>> > > > >> an alternate avenue for app developers to have a request such as
> >>> this
> >>> > > > >> heard?
>
> >>> > > > >> The account I am seeking (http://twitter.com/tweetymail) has
> >>> never
> >>> > > > >> tweeted and has been inactive for at least 6 months.
>
> >>> > > > >> Thank  you.
>
> >>> > --
> >>> > Raffi Krikorian
> >>> > Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi

Reply via email to