At least "people at work" have the potential to use phones to access

I'm worried about users like those in China behind The Great Firewall.
Currently, they can interact with Twitter by using proxies and http
basic auth. But OAuth requires access to (or some sort of
mediation). xAuth could be a solution, but there is already a shortage
of clients that support alternate endpoints, and some of those use
OAuth instead of xAuth (or neither).

When basic auth is shut off, who knows how many Chinese voices will
fall silent… or in North Korea. Or in Iran. Or in …?

I'm interested in hearing what others think about this.


On Aug 12, 10:31 pm, TheGuru <> wrote:
> I'm curious to post this question to see if Twitter has fully thought
> out the impact of forcing OAuth onto their API applications.  While it
> may appear to be a more secure method preferred in principle by users,
> the fact of the matter is that one of the main benefits of the API, is
> the ability for third party twitter alternatives to be created, thus
> allowing people to tweet during "business hours", when they normally
> could not due to firewall / web sense restrictions, etc, that prevent
> them from accessing the domain.
> Via basic authentication, users would never have to visit
> to login and gain access to twitter functionality via api clients.  By
> shutting this down, you are now forcing ALL potential users to login
> via, many of which do not have access to this domain in
> their workplace environment, thus excluding them from easily using
> your service wholesale.
> This can / will, I suspect, have significant impact on twitter usage /
> volume, unless I am missing something and there is an alternative the
> does not require them to directly access the domain to
> grant access.

Reply via email to