> >> good to know but thats not the clean way. > >> and needs some additional cpu cycles on every headerline of course.
> FP> The clean way to add features you need is to derive your own component from > FP> ICS component and add what you need in that derived component. I agree to do > FP> slight changes to ICS to allow easy changes where is could be difficult now. > FP> The idea is to not try to build a giant component by adding tons of feature > FP> which will not be used in most cases. All less used features should be in > FP> derived components, mostly made by the users and not part of ICS. That's > FP> what OOP is all about. > i see. though deriving a custom class becomes difficult if stuff is > hardcoded in the base component. That's why I said "I agree to do slight changes to ICS to allow easy changes where is could be difficult now.". When you find somethingwhich can't be overriden, then let's discuss it. We can make some procedure virtual or extract a procedure out of the current code so that it can be overriden in derived classes. Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware) Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
