The registry thing is for Winsock of course for some timeout...

Ok, could you please also comment on my C++ code posted? Could there be an
AV somewhere that I didn't see??



On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Arno Garrels <arno.garr...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > I am still curious whtehr there is a way to increase the timeout for
> > the connection handshake--possibly in registry.
> OpenSSL and the registry makes no sense to me?
> > I won't implement
> > session caching because it is not realistic to assume same clients
> > accessing the server--you wrote that client and server both must
> > support for session caching.
> That's correct and most browsers in use today support it.
> SSL session caching indeed may only speed up negotiation of the SSL
> connection. For example, very useful in FTP when a secure data
> connection is established or in HTTP with non persistent connections.
> > I want the worst case scenario. Let's
> > think botnet of 1000 zombie IE activeX's attacking our SSL proxy!
> I guess that those kind of DOS clients will never use SSL session caching.
> May be some kind of shorttime blacklisting is more helpful in those cases?
> --
> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be

Reply via email to