Svemu - Reparto Sviluppo wrote: > From: "Arno Garrels" <arno.garr...@gmx.de> >> I already wanted to fix it but > very good > >> since I can no longer override the internal TWSocket class >> I canceled this idea. > ops :D > >> Anyway your interval of 100ms is too short. >> Updating the GUI, especially a ProgressBar, in such short intervals >> is a performance killer. > i update GUI with a thread, than the update of the gui don't impact on > global performance.
That's fine and depending on your implementation won't slow down transfer speed very much. I'll see what I can do, a fix IMO required to revoke Anton's change, rev. #471, which introduced protected method CreateSocket: TWSocket; virtual. -- Arno Garrels > > > From: "Jeff Hamblin" <jphamb...@qtools.com> >> I believe the poster stated "100 ms" -- which would be 10 times per >> second. Probably a bit overkill still, but does provide a smoother >> display that once per second. > > Yes, this is the goal ! > > this is a very simple example: > NEW ICS : http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/6417/icsnew.jpg > OLD ICS : http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/4619/icsold.jpg > > > > BTW now i solved with an avg on the last 2 values. > Now i check with a small files. > > Thank You, > regards > daniele -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
