On Monday 04 February 2008, Michael Schwingen wrote: > Stefan Roese wrote: > >> However, I wonder if it would be possible to simply issue *both* reset > >> commands - if the flash safely ignores the second (unknown) command, > >> this should be fine, but it is relying on undocumented behaviour. > > > > Good idea. Do you (or somebody else) have HW available to test such a > > change? > > I think I can run tests on a small set (~5-10 different AMD-commandset > and 2 intel-commandset, all 16 bit) flashs, but that still leaves the > (small) possibility that there are flash roms that behave different.
Right. But it will be an improvement to the current implementation, where a random command is written as RESET command. And also an improvement to the fixed AMD/Intel RESET command. So I vote for trying this solution. I'll test on a few of mine platforms too. Michael, could please you provide a patch? Thanks. Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
