On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > > Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this case > > the code itself is just larger. > > Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation that > takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's requirements > (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, for example) -- > and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc? > > I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do this. :-) I agree it's sound a better plan but I'll take a lot's of time
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot