On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote: >>> Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this >>>> case the code itself is just larger. >>> Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation >>> that takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's >>> requirements (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, >>> for example) -- and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc? >>> >>> I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do >>> this. :-) >> I agree it's sound a better plan >> but I'll take a lot's of time
Do we think there is some other project that we can acquire one from? >> Right, for now we can use the existing malloc with -fno-strict- >> aliasing. I'm all for doing this. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
