On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote: > On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > >> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote: > >>> Kumar Gala wrote: > >>>> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this > >>>> case the code itself is just larger. > >>> > >>> Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation > >>> that takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's > >>> requirements (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, > >>> for example) -- and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc? > >>> > >>> I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do > >>> this. :-) > >> > >> I agree it's sound a better plan > >> but I'll take a lot's of time > > Do we think there is some other project that we can acquire one from?
there was another public domain malloc implementation Robin pointed me to recently, but i cant seem to remember/find it. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
