On Wed 8 Jul 2009 01:58, Mike Frysinger pondered: > On Tuesday 07 July 2009 18:24:56 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > >> On 15:02 Tue 07 Jul , Scott Wood wrote: > > >>> Kumar Gala wrote: > > >>>> Those would help if the data structs had gotten bigger. In this > > >>>> case the code itself is just larger. > > >>> > > >>> Perhaps we should look into using/writing a malloc implementation > > >>> that takes a space/speed tradeoff more in line with U-boot's > > >>> requirements (using a simple first-fit linear scan of free blocks, > > >>> for example) -- and hopefully more readable than dlmalloc? > > >>> > > >>> I nominate those with the tightest space requirements to do > > >>> this. :-) > > >> > > >> I agree it's sound a better plan > > >> but I'll take a lot's of time > > > > Do we think there is some other project that we can acquire one from? > > there was another public domain malloc implementation Robin pointed me to > recently, but i cant seem to remember/find it.
It was bget http://www.fourmilab.ch/bget/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
