On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/7/19 3:10 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > > b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > > index 322c858c4b..d55460755f 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ > > }; > > }; > > > > +&clkmgr { > > + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > > +}; > > + > > &rst { > > u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > > }; > > @@ -17,3 +21,7 @@ > > &sdr { > > u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > > }; > > + > > +&sysmgr { > > + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > > +}; > > Gen5 doesn't have any clock driver, so does it really make sense to > retain the clkmgr node in SPL now ? Seems like this only grows the SPL > size with no benefit. > But, we need to get clkmgr base address from DT even we don't have clock driver for it. So, clkmgr needs enable in SPL.
Regards Ley Foon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
