On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:33 AM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/7/19 4:31 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > >> On 11/7/19 3:10 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > >> [...] > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > >>> b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > >>> index 322c858c4b..d55460755f 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi > >>> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ > >>> }; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> +&clkmgr { > >>> + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > >>> +}; > >>> + > >>> &rst { > >>> u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > >>> }; > >>> @@ -17,3 +21,7 @@ > >>> &sdr { > >>> u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > >>> }; > >>> + > >>> +&sysmgr { > >>> + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > >>> +}; > >> > >> Gen5 doesn't have any clock driver, so does it really make sense to > >> retain the clkmgr node in SPL now ? Seems like this only grows the SPL > >> size with no benefit. > >> > > But, we need to get clkmgr base address from DT even we don't have > > clock driver for it. > > So, clkmgr needs enable in SPL.
Plus gen5 will have get clock manager soon ;-) Regards, Simon > > Ah, I see, thanks for clarifying. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
