On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:50:35 +0200 Stefano Babic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28/03/2012 14:38, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > Hi Lucasz, > > > I've already forwarded those patches to you. > > They are also available on the mailing list, so I don't know what > > has happened. > > Really nothing, I got all e-mails, I was only not able to explain my > doubt. I try again: > > - In patch 1/3 you add voltage_to_reg to the pmic struct > ==> Ok > - in patch 2/3 you add voltage_to_reg to MAX8997. > ==> Ok > > Everything clear. > > The consequence for me is that PATCH 3/3 shows the reason to add > voltage_to_reg(), and calls the new function pmic_vol_to_reg(), > because you need it, as you have already explained. But I see only > pmic_set_output() and pmic_reg_write() in your patch. > > Stefano > Hi Stefano, I've looked on patches which I've posted and for patches from 1 do 3 there isn't usage for this function. However I'm using this functionality in a code on which I'm working on (Trats), so posting it to the list is only a matter of time. > What have I not yet understood ? (maybe I need a coffe to wake up my > brain...) You understood everything :-), it was my fault. I thought, that patches 2/3 and 3/3 were missing (or by some mishap I didn't send them properly). Now, I think, that everything is clear. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung Poland R&D Center Platform Group _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
