Hi Stefano, On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:43:51 +0200 Stefano Babic <[email protected]> wrote:
> ok, understood. Then I will suggest you resubmit patches 1 and 2 with > your work on Trats, because the patches belong together and they > should be in the same patchset. Hmm, I'm not the only one who is working on this board. Moreover some other targets are using this PMIC as well :-). > And Patch 3 can be already applied as it is, because it has no > dependecies with the other ones. The patch 3/3 depends on patch 2, which defines data for MAX8997 PMIC. And patch 2 depends on patch 1, since patch 1 provides: + int (*voltage_to_reg_conv) (int uV); which function is defined in patch 2 :-). -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung Poland R&D Center Platform Group _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
