On Wed, 2026-10-28 at 16:16 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/28/26 11:40 AM, Nora Schiffer wrote: > > On Tue, 2026-10-27 at 18:24 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On 10/27/26 10:39 AM, Nora Schiffer wrote: > > > > While a separate usbmisc driver could be added, no such driver currently > > > > exists, and it would not necessarily be part of the PHY subsystem. > > > > Rather > > > > than making the misc setup conditional on CONFIG_PHY, make it depend on > > > > the existence of a fsl,usbmisc property. This will allow enabling > > > > CONFIG_PHY on the i.MX7D for the NOP PHY driver's power domain support. > > > > > > > > Also update the code that reads the usbmisc address to use the modern > > > > ofnode API and fix the portnr to be determined from the usbmisc phandle > > > > arg instead of the alias seqno. > > > It seems this patch does multiple things, can you please split it up ? > > > > Okay, I can split this into two parts: > > > > - Make the setup independent of CONFIG_PHY > > - Use address/portnr from ofnode > Yes please, the clearer the separation of changes is, the better > (=easier to review). Also, please split the series by subsystems, so the > maintainers can pick it up through their trees. Thank you.
I get that these will need to go through different trees eventually, but I think in the current stage having the full series to show the whole picture and have something testable makes sense. Will the ehci-mx6 patches go through the USB or the i.MX tree? I feel like pushing them through i.MX would be less of a pain due to the dependencies between the patches. Best, Nora -- TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018 Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider https://www.tq-group.com/
