Thanks, Glenn... good point.
Regards, LeRoy F. Dreyfuss Advanced Technical Services - U2 Technology Analyst IBM U2 Data Management Solutions Tel: 303-672-1254 Fax: 303-294-4832 Mobile: 720-341-4317 External email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, Search - Online! Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV Glenn Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] centialsoftware.c To om> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] stserver.u2ug.org Subject Re: [U2] RE: [UV] merge sort 07/27/2004 06:56 AM Please respond to u2-users At 05:23 PM 7/26/2004, you wrote: > >In any case, switching over to > >Prime-style dimensioned arrays gives you much more flexibility as it only > >consumes a single "slot" in the VARTAB. > >Flexibility, yes, but they do not always perform as well across levels of >call statements. When redimensioning is desired, they are really handy. >When that is not a requirement, static arrays may be the better choice. I >think Mark B. and Jim T. proved that back when release 7 was born. Performance wasn't an issue mentioned, but you are correct. The point was that with the Prime-style dim-array you are not limited to the number of elements within the array whereas with Pick-style dim-array you are limited by the VARTAB size. ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of graycol.gif] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of pic21362.gif] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of ecblank.gif] ------- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
