When you leave the Universe environment and use tools outside of the
environmental controls, there is nothing that is going to enforce
business rules in the external environment.  Yes, the Unidebugger is an
IBM program but I'm not aware of any method of updating the fundamental
operation of this tool to new business requirements without some kind of
standardization on the method of all their tools to denote a
"file/program/record" is in use.  I don't see that happening any time
soon.

Short answer to your earlier question....... Nope.  To comply with SOX,
use another editor/debugging method is my best suggestion.

BobW


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon J Glorfield
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [U2] Unidebugger
> 
> No, file permissions are not altered by the "check out" process.  The
> process simply marks an entry in the FOLDERS database that the program
is
> currently assigned to the login ID of the programmer who wants to make
> changes.  The green-screen editors check the FOLDERS entry for the
program
> and try to match the current login ID against the database.
> 
> 
> Gordon J. Glorfield
> Sr. Applications Developer
> MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
> 301-360-8839
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/31/2005 05:08:42 PM:
> 
> > That's odd....
> >
> > It would seem to me that checking out the program would check the
write
> > permission on the file; therefore, Unidebugger would respect that.
> >
> > Are the file permissions being modified by the "check out" process?
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon J
> > Glorfield
> > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 4:13 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [U2] Unidebugger
> >
> > Speaking of the Unidebugger and Sarbaines/Oxley, we are having some
> > issues here with them.  Currently our green-screen editors are
> > front-ended by a subroutine that checks a database to make sure you
have
> > the program "checked out".  If you don't have it checked out the
editors
> > die with an error message alluding to a security violation.
> >
> > Unidebugger does not honor the "checked out" status of programs in
our
> > library.  Is there a way to add this check to Unidebugger?
> >
> >
> > Gordon J. Glorfield
> > Sr. Applications Developer
> > MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
> > 301-360-8839
> >
> >
> >
> > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or
entity to
> >
> > which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
intended
> > recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby
notified
> > that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
the
> >
> > sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail
immediately.
> > -------
> > u2-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> > -------
> > u2-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to
> which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the
intended
> recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby
notified
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify
the
> sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Reply via email to