That license does not mean "production of code" Rather it means "a production environment" meaning "in use by an end user who isn't a developer...."
Of course developers can use the PE to develop code, that's the very point of making it free to developers. -----Original Message----- From: DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) <nab...@mvdbs.com> To: u2-users <firstname.lastname@example.org> Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2011 12:24 pm Subject: Re: [U2] Code Collaboration The contractual obligations between a employee, contractor and software endor differ. I always abide by the contractual obligations. I have no issues with group collaborations. But I would not use U2 or a PICK erivative for such a project as I can not legally obtain a licensed copy of 2 (not that I have contacted Rocket to purchase a license). The Personal ditions have a strict license which does not include production; which I ould have thought that a group collaboration project would full under. WJhonson wrote: You don't believe in group collaboration? My client is the end user, not the vendor. ---- Learn and Do xcel and Share ttp://mvdbs.com http://mvdbs.com - iew this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Code-Collaboration-tp32856673p32857388.html ent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ 2-Users mailing list 2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users