Well, it's not really worth a fight as I am not a lawyer, but from the wed site:
This edition is designed for single-user personal development and training as well as sales demos. It is not for remarketing or use in production environments. The use of 'personal development and training' is quite explicit to me. I would have thought that producing an application is production and if it was supplied for code/application development, then it would not be limited to 2 users and small files as part of any development is the testing of a normal working environment - large files and multiple users - all which can not be done on a PE edition. But, it's neither here nor there really as how can you develop an application on an environment when you are locked out of important bug fixes and work arounds and such stuff when you are not a VAR. Which begs the point; any VAR here can inform if they get their in-house development and testing U2/SB+/Web Dev software for free? WJhonson wrote: > > > That license does not mean "production of code" > Rather it means "a production environment" meaning "in use by an end user > who isn't a developer...." > > Of course developers can use the PE to develop code, that's the very point > of making it free to developers. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) <nab...@mvdbs.com> > To: u2-users <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> > Sent: Wed, Nov 16, 2011 12:24 pm > Subject: Re: [U2] Code Collaboration > > > > The contractual obligations between a employee, contractor and software > endor differ. > I always abide by the contractual obligations. > I have no issues with group collaborations. But I would not use U2 or a > PICK > erivative for such a project as I can not legally obtain a licensed copy > of > 2 (not that I have contacted Rocket to purchase a license). The Personal > ditions have a strict license which does not include production; which I > ould have thought that a group collaboration project would full under. > > WJhonson wrote: > > > You don't believe in group collaboration? > > My client is the end user, not the vendor. > > > > ---- > Learn and Do > xcel and Share > > ttp://mvdbs.com http://mvdbs.com > - > iew this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Code-Collaboration-tp32856673p32857388.html > ent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > 2-Users mailing list > 2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org > ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > ----- Learn and Do Excel and Share http://mvdbs.com http://mvdbs.com -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Code-Collaboration-tp32856673p32857475.html Sent from the U2 - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
