> From: Symeon Breen > The guys at u2 did NOT write their own xml parser, > they use the libraries from the OS, so on udt on > linux, 7.1 used libxml, 7.2 uses libxerces - just the > same as php, or java, or the linux xml tools, like > xmlwf. So if it fails in u2 it will fail in php.
I had no clue! They did exactly what I've been advocating all along, and what I do with some of my own products. Those libraries are quite competent. For a couple years I've been reacting to the pain of those who couldn't accomplish tasks after they've been through the docs, and I thought it was the software. For this tool I didn't take the time to evaluate the tool myself, feeling I had learned what I needed from the negative commentary here. What a mistake. It seems the issue really is with the documentation for the wrapper and not with the tools themselves. Although it would be interesting to see someone here comment on whether the wrapper is itself a good one. Thanks for that note, Symeon! Humble apologies to the Rocket people working on the XML interface. Now, for the doco people... ;) T _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
