Hi Bob (and all other's who have been following this issue):

I have found the problem. I did try creating a brand new screen and it was
still failing, so I started changing settings, one at a time. I finally
changed the right one: I had the Write Record (Y/N) set to Y. I changed it
to N and all is well. It makes sense since I was using a work record and in
the Process After Screen Accept slot I called a program to update the main
file from the changes in the work record. So there is no reason to have the
screen write the record.

Sorry for taking up everyone's bandwidth. :-)

Bruce



-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Bob
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:14 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question


Hi Bruce,

Make a brand new screen with just the four WORK fields.  If the problem
persists in the new screen then the problem is how you're loading the data
and calling the screen.  If the problem does not appear in the new screen
then start adding bit by bit, saving and testing in small steps until you
either start seeing the problem again, or you get the screen completely
built.  It's got to be an assumption you're making somewhere along the line
that coming up from behind and biting you.

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 5:14 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

Interestingly, it still fails after I remove the process from the field.
There is nothing in any field definition to control the logic flow.

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Bob
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 3:35 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question


So theoretically, the one process is what's causing the "skipping" action of
the Earned Date field.  To test that theory, take it off completely.  This
should let the cursor move between the LI# and Earned Date field, line by
line, each time, regardless if you change any of the values or not.  After
you prove that it is, in fact, this process that's causing the issue then
I'd say our next step is to look at what's happening inside the process.  Is
it a PROC or a BP program?

Maybe we should take this off-list instead of flooding everyone's inboxes.
I'm far from an expert in this but I'm willing to explore possibilities with
you.

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 3:20 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

Yes they are MV fields. There is nothing on the LI# or Award fields. The
sequencing is left to right with no extra processing and they are just @WORK
variables.

I tried to move the process from Process After entrty slot to the Validation
slot and it behaves a little better but it still skips from line 1 to 2 and
so on without stopping at the Earned Date field.

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Bob
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:15 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question


So are these MV fields or SV fields?  Also, you only have a process-after on
the Earned Date?  Nothing on the LI# or Award fields? I'm also assuming your
sequence of prompting in the screen is straight forward, left to right for
these 4 prompts, and you have no extra processes on the DICT entries for
these.  You said they are just @WORK variables, right?


-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:53 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question

Hi Bob,

Thanks for the reply. I agree with you - Kevin's book is fantastic! I have
been using it for many years and still refer to it when I need guidance. As
for the problem: Maybe I am using the wrong processing slot.  What I have is
something like this:

LI#   Award     Earned Date     Paid Date
---   -----     -----------     -----------
999   xxxxx     DD MMM YYYY     DD MMM YYYY

I have the LI# field as input but do nothing else with it. I have the Award
field as no input; display only. I have the Earned Date field as input with
a Process After process to determine what to do with the Paid Date. In the
process I will populate the Paid Date if it is not already there. I will
change the Paid Date to be the same as the Earned Date if the Earned Date
was changed and the Paid date was the same as the original Earned Date. If
the Paid Date is not the same as the original Earned Date I will leave the
Paid Date alone. And lastly, the Paid Date field is diplay only.

To me, this means that I have to prompt the user for the Earned Date - I
cannot skip the field until I know if they are wanting to change the field
so I then will know what to do with the Paid Date. If they do not change the
Earned Date then I will leave the Paid Date as it is.

I also put a DISP line showing the value of the original Earned Date and the
current one in the Process After for the Earned Date and it will show
correctly the first time I enter the screen (after I hit enter in the the
Earned Date field.) but it will show after I enter the LI# field, the next
time I open the screen and skip the Earned Date field. 

Thanks again,
Bruce



-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Woodward, Bob
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 12:09 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] SB+ screen question


Hi Bruce,

It may have to do with your concept of how the work flow is going in screen
and the way your process is working to control your entry.  If you have
access to a copy of Kevin King's green System Builder book "SB+ Solutions",
check the sections in "Special Processing for Multivalued Fields" starting
on page 3-145.  Specifically where it talks about the fact that in an
Multivalue field, the Process Before the Prompt is only executed one time
for the first value, not before each value of the field.  This might be
where you're having the problem.

I love this book, by the way!!!  Thanks Kevin!

BobW

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Lunt, Bruce
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 10:40 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] SB+ screen question

Hi All,
 
I have created a new screen in SB+. The data is built into the work record
and then I want to have the user be able to go through the lines one at a
time in order to change a date field. The date field itself will only be
able to be changed when another associated date field is not already
present. I have the screen working pretty well except for something strange
that is happening. That is, I can call the screen up from the menu and when
I hit enter at the first line it move over to the the date to be modified.
But when I exit the screen and come back into it, the cursor will not move
over to the date but just down to the next line, and the next line again if
I continue to hit the enter key. It never goes over to the date field, just
down a line. When it reaches the bottom of the data it cycles back to line
one and continues to go down the page with each enter key. Now it gets
really interesting. When I exit the screen and then go back into the screen
it will work correctly. And if I exit and re-enter it will fail again. It
just toggles between working correctly and not working at all.
 
I have tried to debug this by putting in DISP statements into the Process
After Display (the first process is called from here) but I do not see what
is causing the screen to react the way that it is.
 
I don't know if I have explained it very well but has anybody else had this
problem before and know how to fix it?
 
Thanks in advance,
Bruce
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to