You are probably better off sizing the file correctly, or sizing it to the size 
it will be at the end of the year, than trying to do what you are proposing.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Laansma
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 10:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [U2] Monthly Multivalue Inserts and Speed

I have a file that is taking a very long time to update, seemingly
longer and longer each month. Here is briefly how the attributes are
organized, a relatively simple example:



Attribute 1 is multivalued with our G/L Period, i.e. 12-01 vm 12-02 vm
12-03 etc.

Attributes 2 through 30 are dependent on attribute 1 and contain a
variety of dollar amounts that are accumulated for the respective period
in attribute 1.



At the end of each month, a new G/L Period is inserted into the
multivalued position of attribute 1 as well as each of the respective
multivalued positions in attributes 2 through 30. Nothing complicated.



My question is this and is aimed largely at the technicians at Rocket
...



If, at the beginning of the year, I were to insert each of the
12-periods into their respective multivalues in attribute 1 and insert
respective <null> multivalues into attributes 2 through 30, thus
performing all of the 'inserts' at once, will the processing each month
run faster as numbers are simply accumulated into attributes 2 through
30 and no inserting of new multivalues will have to be performed?



A couple nuggets of information:



This is only an example. In the actual file, these records contain many
other attributes and the records overall are relatively large, averaging
lengths of about 3,000 according to FILE.STAT

These are not my files so reorganizing them is not an option.



The heart of this question is, as a (numeric) number is accumulated in
an attribute, multivalue or subvalue, what causes the record to
'stretch' in length, thus presumably impacting performance?



I would like to think that numeric information is stored in a more
'compact' method than strings, thus using less space within the database
... but what I 'like' and what 'is' are often quite different.



Thanks!



Sincerely,

David Laansma

IT Manager

Hubbard Supply Co.

Direct: 810-342-7143

Office: 810-234-8681

Fax: 810-234-6142

www.hubbardsupply.com <http://www.hubbardsupply.com>

"Delivering Products, Services and Innovative Solutions"



_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
________________________________


Dave Davis
Team Lead, R&D

P: 614-875-4910 x108
F: 614-875-4088
E: [email protected]
        [http://www.harriscomputer.com/images/signatures/HarrisSchools.gif]

[http://www.harriscomputer.com/images/signatures/DivisionofHarris.gif]<http://www.harriscomputer.com/>
        6110 Enterprise Parkway
Grove City, OH
43123
www.harris-schoolsolutions.com<http://www.harris-schoolsolutions.com>

This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it 
is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, 
privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you 
are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, 
copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all 
copies of the message.

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to