Yes, they *want* to do this so they can continue to receive bulk mailing 
discounts. 

Did you write a UniBasic program to handle the encoding, or did you go another 
route such as using one of the USPS's Java or C encoding programs? 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Wjhonson" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 9:29:59 AM 
Subject: Re: [U2] United States Postal Service - Intelligent Mail barcode 

They don't *need* to :) they *want* to 
Because you get a bulk mailer discount if you do, and you sort it, and its 500 
pieces or larger. 
Something like that. We just did it. 
Personally they probably spent more to program it then they'll ever see in 
savings. Ha. 







-----Original Message----- 
From: sam.alan <[email protected]> 
To: u2-users <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tue, Nov 20, 2012 5:38 am 
Subject: [U2] United States Postal Service - Intelligent Mail barcode 



We have a client that needs to print the United States Postal Service’s 
Intelligent Mail barcode (Imb) on their bills. 

The USPS has provided specifications for encoding the zip codes into the format 
needed to print the IMb. 
https://ribbs.usps.gov/intelligentmail_mailpieces/documents/tech_guides/SPUSPSG.pdf
 

(The encoding specifications begin in section 3.2, page 4.) 

The ideal solution would be for us to add a call from our UniBasic bill print 
program to a subroutine that performs the necessary steps to encode the zip 
codes into the IMb format. Has anyone already written a program that does the 
encoding? 

They are running UniData 6.0.12, SB+ 5.2.4 on Windows Server 2003. 

_______________________________________________ 
U2-Users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 



_______________________________________________ 
U2-Users mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to