Hi Chris - We can't give exacts, but I would expect prior to end of year for Powerbeam (I know this is pretty open) and for AC early in Q1/2015. There will be additional announcements related to AC in the next week or two (related to PTMP, etc...). I know this was also asked on this list as well.
We do try and answer and know we have recently answered this on other lists/forums. Regards, Ben On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Chris Fabien <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, if Ben and Matt are here, what's the Date for DFS on Nanobeam guys? > Got a firm date you can commit to? > > My biggest bitch right now is I need high-gain DFS CPEs and nobody wants > to stock nanobridges anymore, they're scared of getting stuck with half a > container once the Nanobeams get DFS finally. So I'm faced with a long > backorder on a product I need or play the old ubnt scramble to find someone > with a few boxes to get me through another few weeks, which is a waste of > time an ends up costing me more ordering small quantities from a random > supplier and shipping it across the country. > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Look, Ben and Matt are on this board. If you have a complaint, tell them >> directly and give them a chance to make it right. If they don't, then make >> that public. The manufacturer should be liable to defective products, no >> question, but nobody wants a reputation for cheating the customer, >> especially not in a small and public community like this. As for the DFS >> channels, I'm sure that will get resolved and there was enough information >> around that you should have known that feature, along with PTMP, wasn't >> going to happen soon. But this is a small problem compared to the cable >> and Rocket GPS. In those cases, the product either didn't deliver what it >> was supposed to or simply fell apart. Different situation. >> >> Rory >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Paul >> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:21 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 >> >> But we are stuck paying the bill. Especially on the cable crap and time >> to replace and equipment setting on the shelf unable to use. >> >> >> On 11/2/2014 8:20 PM, Rory Conaway wrote: >> > With the Rocket GPS, I agree. The should have publicly offered to buy >> every single unit back. I'm still sitting with 1/2 roll of the crappy melt >> in the sun cable that I have to RMA. With this situation though, part of >> it was Ubiquiti's fault, part of it was the FCC process and the >> inefficiency of government in general. Holding an entire industry back for >> months at a time is another example why other countries out-manufacture us >> and our politicians are inept at best, crooked at worst, for allowing this >> to happen. >> > >> > Rory >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Paul >> > Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 7:09 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 >> > >> > It's not hysteria when they extract money from us for future promises >> and we had to pay a premium to get the equipment early without the needed >> features. >> > >> > On 11/2/2014 8:01 PM, Larry A. Weidig wrote: >> >> Not so sure it is hysteria as annoyance. The lack of any real answers >> from Ubiquiti about this, the nearly turtle pace that development of this >> product line goes at,... Internally I kid with myself (only have jokingly) >> that Cambium will release 5.6 of the ePMP line before Ubiquiti does. Each >> of their releases have significant updates as well. >> >> >> >> >> >> Larry A. Weidig ( [email protected] ) >> >> Excel.Net, Inc. – http://www.excel.net/ >> >> (920) 452-0455 – Sheboygan/Plymouth area >> >> (888) 489-9995 – Other areas, toll-free >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Rory Conaway" <[email protected]> >> >> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> >> >> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:56:03 PM >> >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 >> >> >> >> Tone down the hysteria guys. The FCC certifies manufacturers in batch. >> >> When Ubiquiti had to pull a radio from the FCC for an issue, all their >> >> radios went to the back of the line. That included the Powerbeam. >> >> That's the delay. But yes, the PowerBridge not getting certified >> >> totally sucked. I've got a bunch of them. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: [email protected] >> >> [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> On Behalf Of Paul >> >> Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 5:45 PM >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] NanoBeam M5 400 >> >> >> >> So you are saying we take a risk every time we buy ubnt equipment of >> >> notting getting what was promised and expected unless it is already >> >> there? Maybe we shouldn't trust ubnt at their word? >> >> I have a lot invested in ubnt and they are not feeling very much like >> >> a partner anymore! >> >> >> >> >> >> On 11/2/2014 6:41 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> >>> On 11/2/14, 4:20 PM, Paul wrote: >> >>>> So are you saying the Nanobeams and PTP-AC's we have already bought >> >>>> will not certify because of hardware problems? >> >>>> >> >>> No, he said they have a history of not certifying everything and thus >> >>> a risk of such a situation. The PowerBridge M5 for example. >> >>> >> >>> ~Seth >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >>> >> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ubnt_users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ubnt_users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> _______________________________________________ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ubnt_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > >
_______________________________________________ Ubnt_users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
