I misread the data sheet. The AF11 is not even as efficient as a SAF 256QAM in 
SISO mode.

Ergo, to the bottom of the pile it goes.

Better post that flipflop on twitter and alert CNN. :)

JP

On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:43:33 +0000 (GMT), Faisal Imtiaz wrote
> That was a fast change of position ?
> 
> :)
> 
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
> 
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
> 
> 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

> From: "J Portman" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 8:00:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)
> 
> Actually, looks like the AF11x will perform as good (or maybe better) than 
> the B11 for less cost. 
> 1024QAM with MIMO. They claim 1.3 gig each direction on 56MHZ channel. 
> 
> 799 per radio, ($1600/pair) plus antennas puts the whole link in the $3000 
> range with what looks like outstanding performance for the price. 
> 
> I am now officially considering UBNT as a possible vendor for three links I 
> need to do in the next few months. 
> 
> YMMV, 
> 
> JP 
> 
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 01:10:01 +0000 (GMT), Faisal Imtiaz wrote 
> > I love these kinds of conversations.... everyone get hunkered down to 
> > comparing the tech specs.. 
> > 
> 
> > Yes, Yes, yes... no argument that there better radios....  
> > 
> 
> > But also stop and think for a moment, what was the 'effect' of the B11 
> > becoming available in the market place, for our industry ? 
> > 
> > 1).. A new technical concepts introduced. 
> > 2).. An artificial glass ceiling of 'you cannot touch this' in the Licensed 
> > world challenged and broken 
> > 3)..A new price point established 
> > 4) Greatly Expanded the Market for lower cost licensed links 
> > 5) Greatly expanded the CHOICES !!!!... you may not like it.. but some 
> > others cannot afford your favorite product ...(To each their own). 
> > 
> > Do you think the AF11x would be a product if B11's were never introduced ? 
> > Do you think that the other MFG would be under pressure to bring their 
> > absorbent product pricing down ?  
> > Phoopho it as much as you like, the facts don't change.. 
> > 
> 
> > :) 
> > 
> 
> > Happy Easter Everyone ! 
> > 
> 
> > Regards 
> > 
> 
> > Faisal Imtiaz 
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom 
> > 7266 SW 48 Street 
> > Miami, FL 33155 
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 
> > 
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
> > 
> >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

> >From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> 
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 8:58:33 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber) 
> >
> >
> > 
> > Not to mention the fact that you have to use fixed up/down ratios on the 
> > B11 to make sync work, which makes them even more inefficient...and adds a 
> > bunch of latency. 
> > 
> > All GPS sync really doesn't add any capabilities beyond what you get with a 
> > real FDD link (and actually does have a lot of disadvantages, which have 
> > already been pointed out). B11s are great if you need to move a gig of data 
> > over 11ghz for cheap and have the channels available, but technically 
> > superior to other 11ghz radios they are not. I wouldn't even consider using 
> > a B11 anywhere that I couldn't license enough channels to run it at full 
> > capacity. 
> > 
> >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

> > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf 
> > of Mike Hammett [[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 4:33 PM 
> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber) 
> >  
> > 
> > Sure there is...  as long as it's that exact same product. SAF Lumina can 
> > coexist with SIAE, Ceragon, Alcoma, Exalt, etc. as long as they all Tx or 
> > all Rx. 
> > 
> > B11 can co-exist with any radio as long as it's a B11 with the same sync 
> > settings. 
> > 
> >    -----  Mike Hammett  Intelligent Computing Solutions    Midwest Internet 
> > Exchange    The Brothers WISP   
> >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

> > From: "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]> 
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 4:29:57 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber) 
> > 
> > not trying to be anal.... even in your statement there is a 'as long 
> > as'.... 
> > 
> > There is no such 'as long as' requirement with the B11 sync. 
> > While it is nothing new in concept, but their implementation is unique (at 
> > least for the moment !)  
> > 
> > Faisal Imtiaz 
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom 
> > 7266 SW 48 Street 
> > Miami, FL 33155 
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 
> > 
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
> > 
> >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

> >From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> 
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 3:50:36 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber) 
> >
> >
> > As far as I know, any FDD radio can share frequencies with any other radio 
> > on the tower, regardless of owner or manufacturer. 16 QAM or 4096 QAM. As 
> > long as they're all Rx or all Tx and sufficient azimuth\elevation 
> > separation. 
> > 
> >    -----  Mike Hammett  Intelligent Computing Solutions    Midwest Internet 
> > Exchange    The Brothers WISP   
> >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

> > From: "Faisal Imtiaz" <[email protected]> 
> > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:46:23 PM 
> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber) 
> > 
> > I am confused.. your earlier explanation had a number of conditions implied 
> > before one can reuse the same channel ? unless I am miss-understanding... 
> > 
> > with Mimosa, you can have two radios back to back or next to each other, 
> > belonging to two different providers, and re-use the channel. 
> > 
> > Can we do that today with FDD ? or the other party is going to get their 
> > panties in tbe bunch because their radio can hear your radio ? 
> > 
> > Faisal Imtiaz 
> > Snappy Internet & Telecom 
> > 7266 SW 48 Street 
> > Miami, FL 33155 
> > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 
> > 
> > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Seth Mattinen" <[email protected]> 
> > > To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" <[email protected]> 
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 12:21:12 PM 
> > > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber) 
> > 
> > > On 4/15/17 7:17 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: 
> > >> In case of Mimosa, you are actually getting something that has not 
> > >> existed 
> > >> before in the Licensed Radio world... 
> > >> Their radios don't care if they can hear each other.. and they will 
> > >> still 
> > >> operate, co-exist.... 
> > >> exactly how gps sync, channel reuse works in the TDD world... 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > But I don't need TDD or GPS sync to point take a channel pair I'm using 
> > > in one direction and reuse it in a different direction, so I'm not clear 
> > > what has been improved. The argument is I can do something I can already 
> > > do, but with higher latency. 
> > > 
> > > ~Seth 
> > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > Ubnt_users mailing list 
> > > [email protected] 
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Ubnt_users mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Ubnt_users mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
> >
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Ubnt_users mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > 
> > Ubnt_users mailing list 
> > 
> > [email protected] 
> > 
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users 
> > 
> >
> 
> Joe Portman 
> Alamo Broadband Inc. 
> www.alamobroadband.com 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>

Joe Portman 
Alamo Broadband Inc. 
www.alamobroadband.com
 
_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to