Well. When I first heard about JFS. I did a little research on it on the net.
Based on various sites forums and blogs, *XFS appears to be the most appropriate filesystem* to install on a file server for home or small business needs : - It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s) - It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount - It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB) - This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large number of small to moderate-size files and directories - It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory listing or file search - It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system ressources is quite acceptable for older generation hardware While Linux Gazette Authors, *Justin Piszcz* did not explicitly recommand XFS, he concludes that "Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem performance and scalability". I can only support this conclusion. Angel GPG key: 0xC4639705 Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any advantage using jfs for linux not ext3? > > -- > DARKLORD (:= > > -- > ubuntu-bd mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > -- ubuntu-bd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
