Oh installation is taking hell long time. More than a hour passed still 82%
fortunately today is icl dhaka mach :) On 11/23/08, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ofcourse JFS is good. No problem. > > > Angel > GPG key: 0xC4639705 > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:19 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well that warning make me afraid i choose jfs . I hope jfs is not bad >> at . Hasin vi suggested it at first ubuntu party. >> >> On 11/23/08, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > That is a legitimate warning that has been in every Debian and Ubuntu >> > release and appropriately applicable, I think. >> > >> > Due to an interaction between GRUB and XFS, sometimes the grub-install >> > command will hang when the installer attempts to install grub to an XFS >> > partition. >> > >> > Unless you are comfortable with installing grub by hand in case the >> > installer hangs, you should make a separate ext3 /boot partition >> > (roughly >> > 100MB in size) so that GRUB can reliably install. >> > >> > >> > Angel >> > GPG key: 0xC4639705 >> > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance >> > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh >> > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> I choose xfs but it says The grub boot loader installation often fails >> >> or hangs when / boot is on a XFS file system. >> >> >> >> On 11/23/08, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Well. When I first heard about JFS. I did a little research on it on >> the >> >> > net. >> >> > >> >> > Based on various sites forums and blogs, *XFS appears to be the most >> >> > appropriate filesystem* to install on a file server for home or small >> >> > business needs : >> >> > >> >> > - It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s) >> >> > - It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount >> >> > - It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB) >> >> > - This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large >> >> > number >> >> > of >> >> > small to moderate-size files and directories >> >> > - It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory >> >> > listing or file search >> >> > - It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system >> >> ressources >> >> > is quite acceptable for older generation hardware >> >> > >> >> > While Linux Gazette Authors, *Justin Piszcz* did not explicitly >> >> > recommand >> >> > XFS, he concludes that "Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem >> >> > performance and scalability". I can only support this conclusion. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Angel >> >> > GPG key: 0xC4639705 >> >> > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance >> >> > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh >> >> > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Is there any advantage using jfs for linux not ext3? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> DARKLORD (:= >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> ubuntu-bd mailing list >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd >> >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> > ubuntu-bd mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> DARKLORD (:= >> >> -- >> >> ubuntu-bd mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd >> >> >> > -- >> > ubuntu-bd mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd >> > >> >> >> -- >> DARKLORD (:= >> -- >> ubuntu-bd mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd >> > -- > ubuntu-bd mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > -- DARKLORD (:= -- ubuntu-bd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
