Ofcourse JFS is good. No problem.
Angel GPG key: 0xC4639705 Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:19 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well that warning make me afraid i choose jfs . I hope jfs is not bad > at . Hasin vi suggested it at first ubuntu party. > > On 11/23/08, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That is a legitimate warning that has been in every Debian and Ubuntu > > release and appropriately applicable, I think. > > > > Due to an interaction between GRUB and XFS, sometimes the grub-install > > command will hang when the installer attempts to install grub to an XFS > > partition. > > > > Unless you are comfortable with installing grub by hand in case the > > installer hangs, you should make a separate ext3 /boot partition (roughly > > 100MB in size) so that GRUB can reliably install. > > > > > > Angel > > GPG key: 0xC4639705 > > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance > > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh > > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:34 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> I choose xfs but it says The grub boot loader installation often fails > >> or hangs when / boot is on a XFS file system. > >> > >> On 11/23/08, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Well. When I first heard about JFS. I did a little research on it on > the > >> > net. > >> > > >> > Based on various sites forums and blogs, *XFS appears to be the most > >> > appropriate filesystem* to install on a file server for home or small > >> > business needs : > >> > > >> > - It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s) > >> > - It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount > >> > - It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB) > >> > - This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large number > >> > of > >> > small to moderate-size files and directories > >> > - It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory > >> > listing or file search > >> > - It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system > >> ressources > >> > is quite acceptable for older generation hardware > >> > > >> > While Linux Gazette Authors, *Justin Piszcz* did not explicitly > >> > recommand > >> > XFS, he concludes that "Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem > >> > performance and scalability". I can only support this conclusion. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Angel > >> > GPG key: 0xC4639705 > >> > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance > >> > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh > >> > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Is there any advantage using jfs for linux not ext3? > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> DARKLORD (:= > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> ubuntu-bd mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > >> >> > >> > -- > >> > ubuntu-bd mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> DARKLORD (:= > >> -- > >> ubuntu-bd mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > >> > > -- > > ubuntu-bd mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > > > > > -- > DARKLORD (:= > -- > ubuntu-bd mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > -- ubuntu-bd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
