I choose xfs but it says The grub boot loader installation often fails or hangs when / boot is on a XFS file system.
On 11/23/08, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well. When I first heard about JFS. I did a little research on it on the > net. > > Based on various sites forums and blogs, *XFS appears to be the most > appropriate filesystem* to install on a file server for home or small > business needs : > > - It uses the maximum capacity of your server hard disk(s) > - It is the quickest FS to create, mount and unmount > - It is the quickest FS for operations on large files (>500MB) > - This FS gets a good second place for operations on a large number of > small to moderate-size files and directories > - It constitutes a good CPU vs time compromise for large directory > listing or file search > - It is not the least CPU demanding FS but its use of system ressources > is quite acceptable for older generation hardware > > While Linux Gazette Authors, *Justin Piszcz* did not explicitly recommand > XFS, he concludes that "Personally, I still choose XFS for filesystem > performance and scalability". I can only support this conclusion. > > > > Angel > GPG key: 0xC4639705 > Bangladesh Linux Users Alliance > Fedora Ambassador Bangladesh > Fedora -- Freedom² and rapid innovation > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:19 PM, dark lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is there any advantage using jfs for linux not ext3? >> >> -- >> DARKLORD (:= >> >> -- >> ubuntu-bd mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd >> > -- > ubuntu-bd mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > -- DARKLORD (:= -- ubuntu-bd mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
