Ok, after the response from GitHub I think libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6 is the most sensible approach.
There is no relationship between DPC++ and Clang versions. I think the only reason we want to the dpcpp6 prefix is to distinguish from libclang from vanilla clang (and ROCm clang) in the archive, so there is no need to embed a very specific version (down to the minor/patch version) in the SONAME. What do you think? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2130186 Title: [needs-packaging] intel-dpcpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2130186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
