> libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.0 If you stay with that version in the soname, and at some point decide to bump to, say, libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.1, that means all reverse dependencies will have to be rebuilt, because otherwise they will still be looking for libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.0 and won't find it, because now bin:libclang-dpcpp21 is shipping libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.1 and not libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.0. Do you see what I mean?
Again, this is not a blocker for NEW review, but this should probably be sorted out soon. Also keep in mind that once this is in resolute, since we are past feature freeze, a library transition (bumping that soname) while we are still before resolute final release time would require a feature freeze exception. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2130186 Title: [needs-packaging] intel-dpcpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2130186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
