I am sympathetic to your claimed desire to keep Debian and Ubuntu
aligned. However, it is difficult for me to take this claim at face
value. Ubuntu is its own distribution and is perfectly capable of making
decisions on its own that diverge from Debian. E.g., none of the
coreutils-from and coreutils-from-* mess exists in Debian, despite there
being an attempt to force it upon Debian [1]. This, along with the use
of uutils in general, is a large maintenance burden to undertake, as
evidenced by numerous SRUs.

To say that bumping a version number and applying a single patch not
included in the version distributed in Debian is too much of a
maintenance burden, but multiple SRUs for uutils are not, completely
betrays the idea that Canonical has any interest in keeping GNU
coreutils as a supported package, despite previous promises. It also
feels like you are blaming a Debian maintainer, which feels a bit rude
given that Debian maintainers are under no obligation to consider the
release cadence of Ubuntu in their maintenance work. As I said
previously, Ubuntu is a separate distribution perfectly capable of
making its own decisions.

This feels like proof to me that adequately maintaining multiple
"providers" for coreutils is not possible for a distribution to
undertake. For that reason, alongside licensing concerns with uutils, I
plan to completely oppose the ideas introduction in Debian or other
distributions. This is different from my feelings on the matter a few
months ago [2].

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2026/06/msg00315.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2026/07/msg00012.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2169782

Title:
  Please update GNU coreutils in Ubuntu 26.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-coreutils/+bug/2169782/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to