On Monday, July 25, 2011 11:34:47 AM Mackenzie Morgan wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is > > "Ubuntu member that got their membership based on development > > contribution and not some other kind". Do we really need a different > > name for this? It might be more clear to just have the DMB grant Ubuntu > > membership by name rather than have a separate name/team that doesn't > > actually mean anything different. > > There is only one difference between UCD and any other Ubuntu Member: > UCD can vote in new-DMB elections and in theory vote if there's ever a > technical decision put to a vote, which I don't think there has been > since I became a MOTU.
Do they? I'm having trouble finding documentation on this. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009- December/000659.html says ubuntu-dev (which UCD are not part of) and I think that's correct. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard does not discuss how the DMB is formed (perhaps it should). Scott K -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
