On 2011-07-25 07:51:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think it's a fair point that UCD is confusing. What it means is "Ubuntu > member that got their membership based on development contribution and not > some other kind". Do we really need a different name for this? It might be > more clear to just have the DMB grant Ubuntu membership by name rather than > have a separate name/team that doesn't actually mean anything different.
IIRC the CC preferred a seperate team (would have to dig in my MC mail archive) to be able to track which of the different membership boards added a member instead of one ~ubuntumembers team with many administrators. But I agree that UCD is not very descriptive. Michael -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
