On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 01:42 +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote: > speaking of it, I'm interested where you'd draw the border between > what should > go into -security and -updates.
For -security i will said updates that close CVE's, specially if that involves medium to critical security fixes, the rest to updates > Also, I'd be interested about a personal nitpick: The ghc6 package as > in > intrepid right now, hasn't seen a new upstream version since hardy, > but was > updated with a number of fixes since then, a few irrelevant to hardy > (e.g. > adding a script that produces some output during the time-taking > build, so > that slow buildds won't fail due to timeout), but some which fix imho > important bugs. How would you react if I'd request the current version > in > intrepid to go into hardy-updates? I would suggest to use -backports instead of -updates, since it will be the same package as the one in the devel release, so that would be my suggestion. -- aka nxvl Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
