Hi, On Friday 03 October 2008 14:01:42 Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > 2008/10/3 Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > Hi Stefan > > > On Thursday 02 October 2008 22:25:16 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote: [..] > > > > Also, I'd be interested about a personal nitpick: The ghc6 package as in > > intrepid right now, hasn't seen a new upstream version since hardy, but > > was updated with a number of fixes since then, a few irrelevant to hardy > > (e.g. adding a script that produces some output during the time-taking > > build, so that slow buildds won't fail due to timeout), but some which > > fix imho important bugs. How would you react if I'd request the current > > version in intrepid to go into hardy-updates? > > I would say you to make a debdiff of the fixes for important bugs, If > you want other things I would suggest you to ask for a backport. > [..]
On Friday 03 October 2008 02:29:19 Nicolas Valcárcel wrote: [..] > I would suggest to use -backports instead of -updates, since it will be > the same package as the one in the devel release, so that would be my > suggestion. ok, what possible problems would both of you see with getting the current version into -updates? Also, would you think that there are possible advantages of doing so? Cheers, Stefan. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
